21 August, 2012

The Hunger Games - I felt guilty eating popcorn

565

21 August 2012

R. Linda:

I don't usually do movie reviews, but in this case, you'd find this one right up your alley. Last night I watched The Hunger Games, a futuristic story starring Bristol Palin, ok kidding, not Ms. Palin but the young actress, Jennifer Lawrence. I had to find humour somewhere so this was it, so forgive the stab at making you smile (excuse the pun).

Like the Twilight series (which I have not seen) Tonya had to do a lot of talking to get me to watch this movie. I haven't recovered from the sappy and sobby Notebook, but I finally succumbed to what I thought was a more mature Harry Potter movie. I was wrong! It is more like The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, and I was hooked, but unlike The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, this movie will appeal to less mature audiences.

If the scenery seems familiar, it is the same used in The Last of the Mohicans. If you like that picture (which is one of Tonya's favourites because Daniel Day-Lewis was in it) you will recognise some of the places filmed and that may distract you for a wee bit, but that's the only thing that will distract you. The film is riveting, and for the most part (not all) it flows easily from one situation to the next. Even the music is perfect, adding to the excitement, sadness, and sorrow, and builds each scene to a smooth transition between life and death struggles.

The early concept has a Sophie's Choice comparison in that there is a horrible set of circumstances. Unlike Sophie, decisions are made in which young people are drawn to fight to the death by lottery, retribution for fighting a war that the other side won. But like Sophie, a choice arises as one child takes the place of another, the emotions should be powerful here. The gut-wrenching choice that Sophie made and the viewer's reaction is not achieved. The scene in The Hunger Games didn't come close leaving me disappointed. I wanted to feel that horror and the sacrifice but it fell short. Without giving too much away, as you watch that scene you might ask, would I be brave enough to love that much to do the same? Because the opportunity to affect the viewer intensely was lost, the thought doesn't resonate as it should have.

Once the "tributes" were taken to the city, I found myself wondering during the vetting process, why these chosen young people would not balk at some of the things they were required to do. But shortly, one ascertains they knew their turn might be coming and they were prepared to handle swords, bows, arrows, knives, etc., and the survival of the fittest had been with them early. A little melodramatic, for sure, a little unrealistic, yes, but it kind of works.

Tonya drooled over Lenny Kravitz who was very convincing as a "stylist" with a heart, named Cinna, who offered some damn good advice to our heroine. However, it made one wonder has he an ulteriour motive down the road? It is just enough to keep the viewer guessing and Kravitz did the role justice. The casting couldn't be more perfect. Stanley Tucci's portrayal of the host of the Hunger Games, Ceasar Flickerman was spot on host-wise. And Wes Bentley as the games keeper, besides having the most interesting beard I've ever seen, was convincing as his character began its undoing in an attempt to put on a "good show."

This is a movie of female empowerment that is exceptionally well acted by Miss Lawrence. But credit goes to Director Gary Ross for drawing out the best of his actor's abilities and in particular Lawrence's Katniss character's convincing performance seemed to convey to the audience she was really scared, really mad, really concerned, really there. And most importantly her unique oneness was intact from beginning to end.

Though I hate that something so terrible in story content as the Hunger Games could be conceived and brought to the bookshelves and screen, I realise as most would, that we have had child sacrifice in world history in many cultures (think Mayan). That we would like to think ourselves too "civilised" to such a thing in this day and age is a misconception. One has not far to look to see we as humans still do some pretty horrific things to our children; take the child soldiers of Sierra Leone who are forced to fight at ages they aren't fully aware or awakened from childhood; thrust into an adult primal world, to become mini killing machines, brainwashed and threatened to do the bidding of a more powerful group.

In a deeper sense, the film evokes the idea that humans as individuals have always tried to make sense of their world. This film will help the thinker to realise just how close to nature we are as a product of evolution rather than God's creation. Simple forms of thinking morph into complex forms and all this from within the human psyche. This alone keeps us above the lower creatures. Here is reductionism taken to a mini extreme as if the great pieces of a machine were dismantled and one is reduced to examining the individual parts (even in minuscule) that are necessary to get the whole of the machine working, i.e. the government selecting the best to live, the others die, not to mention retribution at its most violent (small cogs in a big wheel).

The film's premise, much like the devastation growing in Africa that is currently being visited upon its primal lands, leaves in its wake victims of limitless greed, and need which parallels the movie's regions of people devastated by war and now feeling the effects of oppression, in which they become the needy and downtrodden, with no rights, no real freedoms, and hanging over their heads payback in the form of a deadly lottery.

The Hunger Games is more than about the empowerment of women, it is about oppressive governments and how oppression leads to the slow boil of rebellion. Think about it, underlying all that is the concept of family, readily apparent at the beginning of the film, and reminded again with the death of Rue (played beautifully by Amandla Stenberg). Family is never forgotten in the flashbacks as Katniss struggles to survive and keep the good within her intact in a savage environment. At times the group's taunting of Katniss is enough for the viewer to see how anger can lead to savagery. The hunting of Katniss is well done and well mastered by Ross's cinematic images and special effects.

There should be no aggrandisement of the film concept, only the idea that survival can cost, but may be achieved if one works hard enough toward that end. That a female may be as adept as a male in fierce situations is no longer a concept dreamt up by feminists. If SHE is driven to protect SHE will at all costs do what is necessary -- the momma lioness. In this case, the hope is she will from a natural predilection of protection of family, take on the big guys and overturn the oppression of one group over another to hopefully a more harmonious end. It takes but one voice.

I have not read the trilogy, so I am writing without the benefit of complete knowledge of the story. However, by this first instalment of three, I see where the story is going. And if I am correct, then this first instalment does a nice job of setting up the downtrodden to not taking it anymore, rethinking taking on not each other, and turning an aware and hungry eye toward the governing body. I think the portrayal of the "haves" in power is revealing in that there is just enough soft living to find an edge. Donald Sutherland's mysterious leader (President Snow) is well done, he looks like a kindly old grandfather but he is nothing near that. I rather enjoyed his scenes, the menace was an undercurrent among the roses, and I did wonder if the film purposely showed him tending the roses, the thorns hidden but there ready to prick the tender, the one who decides to clip or trim. The idea of blood on snow was in the back of my mind.

This film will entertain you, have you on the edge of your seat, but most of all make you think and hope. I can't think of a better perk to seeing a film than to come out and think about our oneness, our individuality, but also our connection to each other.

Gabe
Copyright © 2012 All rights reserved

17 comments:

mobit22 said...

LMAO

I hope you AT LEAST had beer with your popcorn!

Maggie said...

Interesting summation not without merit. However, the receptive minds of teens who see this movie may intensify a certain insensitivity toward violent acts. I viewed the film and that ate at the back of my thoughts having a teenager in the house. I understand where you are going with this towards an adult audience. My summation: Survival of the fittest is quite evident, a throwback to gladiators and public spectacle towards violent confrontations ending in a Mad Max mentality put forth by movie makers. Thumbs down for young and impressionable viewers.

Gabriel O'Sullivan said...

I agree. Unfortunately teens ARE the targeted audience. Hollywood screws up AGAIN.

Gabriel O'Sullivan said...

No I was reduced to bottled water. ;(

Anonymous said...

I saw this as well. I think the message is obvious Maggie, where there is a mind, there is a force arrayed against the primal elements of physical domination. There is a potency of motion that leads to conquest which is prominent in the motivation of the character Katniss Everdeen to win the games. Katniss is an edible plant - name means 'belonging to an arrow' (by the way). An immature mind will not grasp the concept and therefore, I agree with you as far as young audiences are concerned.

Anonymous said...

Hey Maggie, as you well know the book was written for teenagers. While I understand and share your concern, I think Ms. Collins trilogy is an exceptionally written sci-fi novel that instills or should instill in the minds of the young, the ideals of becoming "right" minded no matter how hard the struggle. The books as well as the movie have a certain darkness within its dystopian universe that does indeed lead one to question ones beliefs and take notice of the world we live in. The ideas contained in both books and movie have a unique complexity that pack a powerful narrative within the bounds of fiction and futuristic type movies. As an aside I had to wonder if Suzanne Collins had read the short story The Lottery by Shirley Jackson, a horrific story, well done if not one of the best pieces of short modern fiction (ever written).

Irish Rogue said...

What A? 'a force arrayed against the primal elements of physical domination' are we taking a flick to a whole new level or what?

I have not seen the movie, but I know enough about the story and have to wonder what deep psyches are working in the viewing.

Fionnula said...

can I get my two cents in here? Gabe, I noticed the same thing about this movie, for a minute in the beginning I thought I was watching The Last of the Mohicans! not only the scenery but the way Katliss was running with her bow and falling down the leave strewn hills...well looked awfully familiar. i had to look up who directed it because I was sure it was the same guy but no it isn't. I thought there was a connection with the music too! I read the books and like the books better. they added things to the movie that weren't in the book and changed things about some of the characters that they should have left alone. I like the books over the movie. ok am done.

Gabriel O'Sullivan said...

I hear ya! The deer hunt -- you noticed. Yea! I thought I was the only one. The original soundtrack the selection, Katniss Afoot, sounds like the score from Last Of. Throughout the score is that certain underlying beat of the drums much like in Last Of only it isn't consistent. There is a little of LOTR and Narnia in there. It be like JN Howard incorporated all the good parts from those films to this one, but there is no standout piece where you know instantly a piece is from The Hunger Games. I will say Searching for Peeta has that Irish sound to it on the fast part!

Guilette said...

HI GABE!!!!!! Long time no see. I worked a year abroad and now I'm back! Woohoo! I rented The Hunger Games going to watch tonight. Have to catch up! Wow you have been busy!

Dew said...

I personally have not seen the film or read the books though I have them, but me 85 year old Mam beat me to it. Yes she did! She was very disturbed by the whole concept and how in order to survive one had to kill, maime and torture. She feels there is enough violence in the world. She has read the books but not seen the film, my sons, on the other hand have seen the film and not read the books. They were not bothered by it so I think it interesting the different generations and Maggie makes a valid point, a lot of young minds have become desensitized. One only has to turn on the news here and there is shooting after shooting, murder, rape,riots,molestation and that is the sad truth and yes it is the world we live in. I am going to watch it now Gabe so I can throw my two penneth in ;-)

Gabriel O'Sullivan said...

Gullie welcome back!

Capt Jaack said...

I guess it wouldn't be worth saying that Captain Jaack's Underwater Adventure wouldn't be "deep" enough for anyone to review? Hum? And I guess this means I have to go out and rent this subject of psychological discussion and teenaged angst...I'll do that now.

Guilette said...

I saw it and I liked it though I do question why something so violent is marketed toward teens. I like the Girl with the Dragon Tattoo better though. I thought that had a lot more going for it and the books to that were amazing. This seemed predictable but the fire wall was scary, I found myself ducking each time a ball of flame was let loose.
Captain Jack, your comment made me laugh.
Lucky, I read The Lottery online, how do you know these things? Good call.

mobit22 said...

I'll have to give this movie one thumb down!
Kind of sounds like new movie review site.LOL

Gabriel O'Sullivan said...

So does this mean you didn't like it? LMAO

mobit22 said...

oh yeah, I read THE LOTTERY AS A KID! I'd be the first one offered up.LOL
nightmares for a very long time.